Breaking News
More () »

Governor Lamont signs police reform bill

The controversial bill's sticking point for many was the issue of qualified immunity for police officers

HARTFORD, Conn — Two days after the Senate passed the controversial police accountability bill, Governor Ned Lamont signing the bill into law. 

The signing of House Bill 6004, An Act Concerning Police Accountability happened during an after press conference Friday.

Gov. Lamont was joined by Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz, the co-chairs of the Connecticut General Assembly's Judiciary Committee, State Senator Gay Winfield (D-New Haven),  State Representative Steve Stafstrom (D-Bridgeport), State Representative Brandon McGee (D-Windsor, Hartford), State Representative Anthony Nolan (D-New London), who also serves as a New London police officer, and Waterbury Mayor Neil O’Leary.

The bill puts in place, implicit bias training, a requirement for body and dash cams, will prohibit the use of military equipment, ban chokeholds, require officer bystander intervention, and mandate mental health assessments.

But considered the most controversial part of the bill came down to qualified immunity for officers. In the bill, it's stated any person who felt they were a victim in a police incident may bring a civil action for equitable relief or damages.

The bill also stated that qualified immunity will only be applied to officers going forward if it is clear they had acted in good faith whenever the incident occurred to cause the lawsuit. 

The bill goes on to say that qualified (governmental) immunity will not be applied in suits that are for equitable relief and that complaints have to be filed within a year of the incident occurring.

Senate Republicans contend that, by eliminating qualified immunity, Connecticut police officers would now be personally exposed to paying a plaintiff if they lose a judgment.

"I understand the purpose but I think the way the bill is drafted, you are going to see a plethora of lawsuits brought against municipalities and officers. And a plaintiff’s lawyer--they are going to sue everybody. You are going to sue good cops and bad cops but you are going to sue everybody and see how it all shakes out," said Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano (R).  "I think the municipalities are going to take an awful lot and I think good officers are going to start to retire and leave so they don’t have blemishes on their record."

But, Democrats say, if you're a good cop, you should not be concerned.

"I think that that it’s ironic that all of the debate focused on qualified immunity since that’s relatively a small change from current law," said Senate President Pro Tempore Martin Looney (D). "In order to not have the benefit of qualified immunity, a police officer conduct has to be malicious and willful and avenge high standards--a difficult standard to meet. There are many other components to the bill."

For Senator Gary Winfield (D-New Haven), a co-author of the bill, it's good policy.

"These things are not just about 'I don't want to see someone killed'" said Winfield. "They’re about the interaction of police in certain communities and the way that they are treated in the way that their power is used.

A police source in one of Connecticut's largest cities tells FOX61 they expect a mass exodus for their department. A Meriden Police source says up to one-third of their 123 sworn officers are exploring retirement or leaving the profession.

Before You Leave, Check This Out