x
Breaking News
More () »

Alex Jones moves for new trial in Sandy Hook parents' defamation suit

The motions were filed on Friday by Jones' and Free Speech Systems' attorney Norm Pattis.
Credit: FOX61

HARTFORD, Conn. — Alex Jones has moved for a new trial in the Sandy Hook parents' defamation suit against the "Infowars" host and his company Free Speech Systems, LLC. 

The motions were filed on Friday by Jones's Attorney Norm Pattis. The requests said Judge Barbara Bellis' pretrial rulings resulted in an unfair trial and “a substantial miscarriage of justice.” 

The first motion is to set aside the verdict in which Jones was ordered to pay various families of Sandy Hook more than $965 million in a Waterbury courtroom. 

RELATED: Alex Jones ordered to pay more than $965M in Sandy Hook trial

Motion to Set Aside Verdict: 

Defendants Alex Jones and Free Speech Systems, LLC, herewith move, pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes section 52-228 b and Practice Book Section 16-35, to set aside the verdict on grounds apparent in the record and on the basis of remittitur. In short, the defendants contend that the cumulative weight of the court’s ruling on pre-trial motions and its evidentiary rulings resulted in a complete abdication of the trial court’s role in assuring a fair trial and that the amount of the compensatory damages award exceeds any rational relationship to the evidence officered at trial. The defendants seek a new trial. The verdict in the instant case is both unjust and against the weight of the evidence.

Sign up for the FOX61 newsletters: Morning Forecast, Morning Headlines, Evening Headlines

The second motion was the defendant's motion to set aside the verdict on the basis of remittitur, citing the verdict to be a result of passion and prejudice. 

Defendants' Motion for Remittitur: 

Defendants Alex Jones and Free Speech Systems, LLC, herewith move, pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes section 52-228 b and Practice Book Section 16-35, to set aside the verdict on grounds apparent in the record and on the basis of remittitur. In short, the defendants contend that verdict is exorbitant and a result of passion and prejudice. Additionally, the plaintiff’s failure to offer any evidentiary standard by which the jury could calculate damages rendered the verdict a species of wild speculation unsupported by law and resulted in a verdict that denies the defendants due process of law.

RELATED: What happens now after Alex Jones is ordered to pay almost $1 billion in Sandy Hook trial

Christopher Mattei, a lawyer for the 15 plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Jones, declined to comment for the Associated Press on the filing Saturday but said he and other attorneys for the Sandy Hook families will be filing a brief opposing Jones' request.

Twenty first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School died in the attack on Dec. 14, 2012.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

---

 Have a story idea or something on your mind you want to share? We want to hear from you! Email us at newstips@fox61.com

----

HERE ARE MORE WAYS TO GET FOX61 NEWS

Download the FOX61 News APP

iTunes: Click here to download

Google Play: Click here to download

Stream Live on ROKU: Add the channel from the ROKU store or by searching FOX61.

Steam Live on FIRE TV: Search ‘FOX61’ and click ‘Get’ to download.

FOLLOW US ON TWITTERFACEBOOK & INSTAGRAM

Before You Leave, Check This Out